One of the things that I love about living overseas are the small differences between Western and Chinese culture that are constantly on display. People are people everywhere and most of us have the same basic desires, and yet there can be wide chasms between us that prevent us from understanding each other. It is these differences that I am constantly bombarded with that are the most interesting things about living in Beijing. Small actions that people take can be clues to a broader historical context. I will try to note them here when I see them.
For instance, today when I was on the train at rush hour, I had to literally fight may way into and out of every train, nearly knocking over young people, old folks, men and women alike, or I would never get where I was going. Nobody will make way for you and people will push you down to get where they need to go. Just staying upright is a constant battle.
And it is not confined to jockeying for position within trains. I had to switch lines today and even the simple act of walking through hallways and down a flight of stairs can become a full-contact sport as people rush to get by you (no matter how fast you are moving there is always somebody trying to go faster), try to get a better position in line or just plan don’t want to be stuck behind you.
It all got me to thinking: Where does this come from?
Sure, there are people who push and shove back in the US, but as a society, we tend to wait in relatively orderly lines and move in a common fashion that allows for the right of way to go to the person who is in front of you.
Generally.
But this all flies out the window here in China. Lines are anathema here. Everywhere that you go people will tend to jostle for position rather than defer to whomever was there first. In fact, every single bank that you visit here requires you to take a number; there are no lines to stand in because of the chaos that would ensue.
I’m not an anthropologist, but I started to consider that in a society that has matured in an environment of consistently scarce resources (such as food) and living space, over the millennia people will have tended to rush as fast as they could towards what they wanted and/or needed to ensure that they got it before their neighbor did. They would’ve had to in order to survive. It doesn’t take a big leap to see how the habit of running and pushing and shoving might stay with the culture in the developed cities considering that those born in them are really only 1 generation removed from the peasants scraping by in remote villages.
Utterly alien and completely fascinating.
All of this is to preface my thoughts about a fantastic article in today’s Boston Globe. It has nothing to do with China or Boston specifically, but apparently there has been a follow-up study to some early 19990s research where scientists tried to quantify why men tend to be attracted to women with a specific hip-to-waist ratio (0.7). It seemed to fly in the face of evolutionary theory: Women with wider waists (and, hence a smaller ratio) actually have advantages over their curvier sisters: They tend to be more fertile, have smarter babies, are more resistant to certain types of cancers and can endure greater amounts of stress before it adversely effects their health. So it follows that man’s image of the “ideal” female shape would tend towards the more reproductively successful gals, right?
Wrong. It turns out that the “ideal” female shape varies between cultures and socio-economic strata all around the world. There is a lot of great data in these studies and the answers are complicated, but what it all boils down to for me is nature vs. nurture. Or, more specifically, the absurdity that our lives, societies and cultures are driven by one or the other. We are products of both our evolutionary successes and our sociological morays.
As for all of the ladies wincing at the thought of objectification for the sake of science, here is the final quote from the Globe’s piece that really should have been the lead, as it is clearly the most important:
“It’s important that people are aware that there is no set standard for what’s attractive… and there are a number of different factors that influence what we find attractive at different points in our lives and under different circumstances.”
Happy reading, folks!































